By the end of the novel Maestro the reader feels that both Keller and Paul are egotists and equally unattractive characters Essay

By the end of the novel the subscriber feels that both Keller and capital of Minnesota ar egotists and equally unattractive characters. While I agree with the root part of this statement I disagree with the second. In this essay I will be discussing the characters egotism, is relation to each other. I will exempt the reasoning behind the characters reasonings and because of this why I retrieve that capital of Minnesota is the more unlikable character of the two. The commentator learns very on in the curb that each of these characters has unattractive qualities. Goldsworthy creates these characters equally undesirable in their own right. Pauls superficial view on sense and his quick judgement in particular when it comes to Keller contri exactlye to the portrayal of Paul as a fairly unlikable character.Paul makes the transition in this book growing up and this in its ego is very much a contributing factor as we see him grow into his egotism where as Keller is explained and somewhat redeemed. Despite Keller world describes as a virtuoso he is viewed by Paul -and there for the reader -as arrogant and patronising. The boy is minded(p) to much self satisfaction he observes of Paul, which is a fair definition as Paul is often critical and patronising of Kellers command techniques, which may well stem from his superior view of himself, of course he sounded better, he had a better piano. Paul from very early on is self centred, believing he is the trump.He takes things at face value, especially when it comes to judging Keller and his teaching style. He does non take the time to crack and learn before making assumptions. When he says Hes a Nazi he could non have been more wrong. This statement proceed more apparent towards the end of the novel when we learn about Kellers association with the NAZIs and the consequences it had not only on his life but overly those of this family, his wife and son. Kellers anti-social behaviour tends to bring a dist ance amongst himself and the other people in Darwin but also from himself as a character and the reader. But this is not a disconfirming influence, in fact it makes the reader empathise with him or at least intrigue the reader enough to be on his side. This could be seen as one of Keller save factors.When Keller chooses to move to Adelaide, Paul realised that his extradite was self imposed His exile was chosen, not forced upon him, Kellers arrogance and naivety during the War are why he chooses to stay in Vienna and ultimately causes the deaths of his wife and son. Keller believes that he had been betrayed, that by being close to Hitler his family would be saved. This assumption was naive, he says himself I knew these people, these murderers. I had signed their concert programs. His self imposed closing off in Darwin as a result of this evokes empathy and sympathy in the reader and this could again be seen as a redeeming quality. As the reader learns that Keller has reason for his egotism, Paul- because of his youth is viewed negatively because he comes off as an unspiritual child. When he moves to Adelaide we realise however that he has somewhat been groomed into this arrogance. teaching from Keller, Paul learns a lot but he also gets reach all of Kellers arrogance as well. Learning the techniques from Keller but not how to play the medicinal drug with passion, Paul starts to believe that technique is the only main(prenominal) thing. Keller as we learn has reason to focus on the technique, simply because he cannot stand the pain of actually feeling the music, evident in his scatty finger. Pauls arrogance grows through with(predicate)out the book. As he progresses through the lessons with Keller and also as his love life grows with Rosie, he grows more self assured. Paul is very self driven and thinking he is the best he makes decisions that show his arrogance to the fullest.The choice to move to Adelaide right on the cusp of getting to finally know everything about his teacher shows that not only is he arrogant he is an egotist. He wants the fame and glory of being an amazing piano player. While Paul appears narcissistic, he is often certified of his flaws. Despite being pretentious, Paul is fundamentally shy. His refuge in the music room parallels Kellers self-imposed solitude at the Swan. Paul is changeable of himself, as his self-perception lagged timidly behind his growth spurt. His arrogance protects him from his bleakness and his inability to attain greatness. Although Pauls delusions of grandeur mark him as a weak character.At the end of the novel Paul admits that he is able to dupe my audience at the odd concertbut nevermyself, referring to his musical ability. Paul comes to the realisation that he will never be the piano player he desires and this admission evokes some empathy from the superior readers. Pauls egotisms is much more prominent than Kellers, and the tragedy of Kellers life in a way prevents the reade r from having negative feelings towards him. Paul and Keller are represented as egotistical characters but whereas Pauls is viewed as negative with small redeeming factors, Kellers is understood and earned and explained from his passed.