Labeling theory and its effects to the society Essay

Labeling possibility is a possible action that tries to explain the center of labeling by the association on an man-to-man. It shows that by labeling an individualistic for interpreter as insane, that could mark the beginning of the process of him being insane. It is indeed important for society to be c atomic number 18ful on the labels that they give to individuals beca habit of the effects that argon likely to come with this labels. This paper is going to look into the components of labeling possible action and its effects.Labeling Theory Labeling theory looks at the influence that the society has on the growing of a certain bearing by an individual because of the societys perception of him/her. The way an individual has been described and categorized by the familiar can greatly affect the behavior of the said individual. It also develops come on the linguistic tendency of the majority in society to label those who are perceived to be minority or with behaviors differ ent from the rest, negative labels. concord to this theory, the stigmatizing or negative labels given to these individuals sop up a significant effect on them such that some of the individuals may proceed to being unnatural (Becker, 1964). An example is an individual who is perceived to be a drug screwball. regular(a) if the drugs do not affects his professional life, when individuals whom they work with come to know that they use drugs, they may start avoiding and associating them with all other crimes that are done by drug addicts.Because of this stigmatization, the individual may end up loosing the job and could not be able to secure a decent job in any other place. This will leave him with no other cream other than involving in crime for survival, something which he could not have gotten himself in were it not for stigmatization and labels that were directed to him/her (Becker, 1963). According to Becker (1963), the process of labeling cannot be pretended to be purely rig ht because if so, it could have not considered the general practice of deviance which is it is the society that creates it.The society may create some genial rules and apply them to some given individuals with step to the fore proper consideration. Their claims cannot be justified because at that place is a possibility that the individual may not be what the society perceives him/her to be. Other offenders may be lucky to go without being detect by people and you cannot say that just because they were able to escape unseen, they are clean and cannot qualify to be deviant or those who have been denominate are all the same.This is because there may be false accusations. The theory may affect the society in many ways. It may head teacher to increased crime rate among individuals and society. This is because of the effect that the theory has on an individual like in the example above of a drug addict who will be forced to engage in dangerous activities because of divergence by the people around him/her.It may also serve as an example to other individuals to avoid committing crimes considering the condemnation involved after carrying out the crime (Becker, 1964). Victims of this theory can also become victims of self fulfil prophesy. Because of the perception that the society has on these individuals, they may begin to change their behavior to that which the society has labeled them to have either consciously or unconsciously. An example is a homosexual individual.Being a homosexual may not have an effect on an individuals professional life, plainly if his colleagues become aware of that fact, it may be difficult for the said someone to comfortably work therefore his work will also assemble as a result. Poor results in the work place have been brought about by discrimination that an individual has received from his colleagues because of the label of a homosexual that he had acquired. Although the individuals may be determined to do things right, it may be difficult to abide by that (Becker, 1963).Although this theory may bring about positive influences in society such that others may interpret from victims, it makes victims to be more deviant. This could be because of lack of support from the individuals around the victims qualification life more unbearable for them pushing them further into crime. References Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders labeling theory. New York, NY The on the loose(p) rouse Becker, H. S. (1964). The Other Side Perspectives on Deviance. New York, NY The Free Press